SharePoint Architect looks very good word but what exactly skills needed to be real Architect?
I agree with Eric, after all as a being IT man (regardless of levels) is responsible to implement right way. But there might two perspectives. One could be from client point of view and second could be IT team point of view. I believe, you are talking about client point of view. While, if we see from IT team or technically point of view, it requires knowledge of everything including SP, DB etc etc. including network setup. But, i believe, few things are not really not required to be called Architect i.e. network knowledge because it can be delegated to network team. But, when you sit in interview as Architect, its being expected! This is general phenomenon which can not be changed! So this term Architect is very confusing like Microsoft licensing!Â